User talk:Gboyers/archive9: Difference between revisions

Line 89: Line 89:
By the way, just asking, whats the latest news around the place? And is there any particular task you need assistance with? I'm still here to help after all :).
By the way, just asking, whats the latest news around the place? And is there any particular task you need assistance with? I'm still here to help after all :).
'''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 11:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
'''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 11:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
:To be honest with you, I kind of liked the Moderator/Inspector rank. When I put in a request for promotion to Moderator I considered the role to be one where you can show your competence as a staff member and prove that you can successfully work as part of the team and handle the new responsibilities that you're given. To me, it would have been something along the lines of "Training" to be an administrator, so you can develop the maturity and skills to be finally given the position, while still contributing to the wiki at the same time.
Of course, I've never been a moderator, so I can't really speak from experience. But I think we've seen how it can train users to become administrators while keeping their interest in the role (Yay! I'm a staff member!), instead of them having to be on for years before receiving official recognition for their work.
Just my 2 cents there, while I never looked at moderators having a big a role in the wiki's day-to-day activity, I always noted it as a way for them to experience the staff position and gain the maturity to become admins (Masterpogihaha for example). Personally, I think there's no huge harm in having a Moderator/Inspector role, It gives users something they can work towards that is more easily obtainable that Administrator, but that's just IMO really.'''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]])
Members, Alumni
3,424

edits