Talk:Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories: Difference between revisions

 
Line 5: Line 5:


Can you please explain this sentence "but a perspective that somehow a lot of people like you are vocal about it."  i dont really get it.[[User:Nameless assasin|Nameless assasin]] ([[User talk:Nameless assasin|talk]]) 13:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Can you please explain this sentence "but a perspective that somehow a lot of people like you are vocal about it."  i dont really get it.[[User:Nameless assasin|Nameless assasin]] ([[User talk:Nameless assasin|talk]]) 13:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
:SA sold a lot of copies, so naturally there is a large fanbase for SA. So when R* makes a new GTA game that doesn't have everything SA offered, naturally you get a lot of people complaining about that, ignoring the fact that R* never build their games on top of their previous ones. I'm not sure why people like to think so one-sided but apparently a lot of people do, so on the forums I keep seeing people deriding later GTA games for missing some features from SA, listing everything that's apparently missing, but ignore everything else these games introduced that made these later games just as good or even better than SA. How can the number of interiors or features be so much more important that the city, setting, or missions themselves?--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 21:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
12,236

edits