Talk:Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories: Difference between revisions

:"i understand that psp cant withstand the memory" - End of conversation? But seriously, saying any GTA game released after SA is a step backward is a perspective thing, but a perspective that somehow a lot of people like you are vocal about it. Do you ever think that SA may be a step backwards for GTA, too? <!--SA did not include so many features from past GTA games and added those that hinders gameplay. SA does not have vehicle-mounted weapons from GTA 2, does not have vehicle-based weapons like oil slicks from GTA 2, does not have weapons like M-16 from III or Screwdriver from VC, does not have any missions that involves car bombs that III has, can only purchase one asset unlike VC where you can purchase multiple, inability to see outside from inside an interior unlike VC, horribly low draw distance compared to any other over-the-shoulder GTA games, etc. etc. etc. LCS made huge steps forward for the GTA series, most notably by being the first over-the-shoulder GTA game on a portable and the first to have a full fledged multiplayer, and the first to use dynamic reflections on cars. The list I have created, biased against SA instead of bias for SA like what you have typed, any reasonable person can see that SA is not the ultimate GTA game. I can apply this to ALL GTA games and anyone should see that no GTA game is better than the other one in terms of features. The next GTA games are never built entirely on top of the previous and so do not ever have every feature from the previous games.-->--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 20:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)